Choose the cleaner alternative to Apollo
Looking for an Apollo alternative? Tables provides accurate B2B contact data, email enrichment, and phone numbers at significantly lower prices. Enrich thousands of leads without paying per-seat fees or inflated credit costs.
Compare Tables and Apollo
See the main differences at a glance with our side-by-side comparison.
| Comparison | | |
|---|---|---|
Email Cost per 1000 | $23 | $25 |
Phone Cost per 100 | $23 | $20 |
Seat Limits | No seat limits | Charged per user |
CRM Integrations | ||
AI Enrichment |
Lower cost for email and phone data
Apollo uses a subscription model combined with credits to unlock emails and phone numbers. While this works well for many teams, the cost can increase quickly when enriching large numbers of contacts. Tables focuses on offering email and phone enrichment at significantly lower prices, helping teams reduce the cost of prospecting.
No seat limits
Apollo charges per user, which means adding more sales reps or marketers increases the monthly subscription cost. Tables removes this limitation by allowing unlimited users. Teams can give access to everyone in sales, marketing, or recruiting without worrying about extra seat fees. This makes it easier to scale prospecting across the whole team.
